Legal Opinion

Passaro v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 17, 1984No. 669-81CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SETO, Judge.

This military pay case is currently before the court on defendant’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous opinion on cross motions for summary judgment. 4 Cl.Ct. 395 (1984) (“Possaro I”). Defendant moves the court to reconsider its ruling that the court properly has jurisdiction of the case. The motion has been fully briefed by the parties, and oral arguments have been heard.

The facts of this case and the background of the relevant legislation are set forth more fully in Possaro I, which in turn relied heavily on the Court of Claims decision in Barber v. United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Heirs of BoisdoréSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  3. Barber ex rel. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Passaro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Helen Passaro, Individually and as of the Estate of Ramon Passaro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API