Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 30, 2005No. 04-90CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

On January 26, 2004, John Doe (“Plaintiff’) filed this action in the United States Court of Federal Claims seeking compensatory and injunctive relief arising from a final decision of the United States Air Force (“Air Force”) to retire Plaintiff because of a medical disability.1

The court’s review of final decisions of the Armed Services is limited by well established United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit precedent. See, e.g., Dep’t of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 530, 108 S.Ct. 818, 98 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. NEQ, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. PHT Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. International Outsourcing Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Arinc Engineering Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API