Legal Opinion

Oil, Chemical, & Atomic Workers International Union v. Conoco, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 7, 2001No. 99-5173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

Conoco appeals the district court’s decision to submit a series of grievances filed by the plaintiffs, the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union (AFL-CIO) and its Local 5 857 (the union) to arbitration. After staying the instant action pending the completion of arbitration, the district court issued an order explaining that it had not yet made a dispositive ruling on the issue of whether the grievances were arbitrable. We hold, consistent with developing case law, that the district court should have decided whether the grievances at issue were arbi-trable…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Presbyterian Healthcare Services v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  2. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employee & Moving Picture Technicians, Artist, & Allied Crafts of the United States v. InSync Show Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Perez v. Qwest Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  4. Casares v. James M. Brown Builder, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Kalmar Industries USA LLC v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 838District Court, D. Kansas · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API