Legal Opinion

Valenti v. Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1994No. 90CV-0323-TM; CA A74166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

This is an action to enforce restrictive covenants in a residential subdivision. Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for injunctive relief requiring defendants to move or modify their house so as not to obstruct plaintiffs’ view of the mountains. Defendants cross-assign error to the trial court’s failure to dismiss plaintiffs’ action. They also cross-appeal, contending that the award of attorney fees is inadequate.

In 1988, plaintiffs purchased their two-story home in the West Ridge Subdivision in Deschutes County. Located on a ridge, the subdivision lots have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shipler v. Van RadenOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lincoln Construction, Inc. v. Thomas J. Parker & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hanson v. Salishan Properties, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kampstra v. Salem Heights Water DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Donaca v. IvallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Valenti v. HopkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Taylor v. McCollomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Valenti v. HopkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API