Legal Opinion

Valenti v. Hopkins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1996No. CC 90-CV-0323-TM; CA A74166; SC S42001PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*327VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

This is an action to enforce restrictive covenants in a residential subdivision. After the subdivision’s Architectural Control Committee (ACC) approved defendants’ house plans, plaintiffs brought this action, asserting that defendants’ construction would obstruct plaintiffs’ view in violation of the subdivision’s restrictive covenants. The trial court denied injunctive relief. The Court of Appeals gave no deference to the ACC’s determination and, on de novo review, held that defendants had violated the restrictive covenants. The Court of Appeals, therefore, reversed and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ludgate v. SomervilleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Snashall Et Ux v. Jewell Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Alloway v. MoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Friberg v. ElrodOregon Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HeisserOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. U.S. Bank Trust National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. PGF Care Center, Inc. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Portland General Electric Company v. U.S. Bank Trust National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Prairie Hills Water & Development Co. v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API