Legal Opinion

Ambridge Boro. v. Pa. P.U.C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 1, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Argued May 1, 1939. The vital question involved in this appeal is whether a borough which supplies water to its inhabitants from its own water plant, and in connection therewith furnishes water to consumers outside the borough, residing or doing business in a township abutting thereon, (1) may establish a rate schedule for the consumers in the township different from that used in the borough, based upon the specific investment in the township and the allocation of a proper proportion of general plant investment, in arriving at the rate base, and a similar division and allocation of operating,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Reigle v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Altoona v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. State Col. Boro. Auth. v. Pa. P.U.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. State College Borough Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API