Ambridge Boro. v. Pa. P.U.C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Argued May 1, 1939. The vital question involved in this appeal is whether a borough which supplies water to its inhabitants from its own water plant, and in connection therewith furnishes water to consumers outside the borough, residing or doing business in a township abutting thereon, (1) may establish a rate schedule for the consumers in the township different from that used in the borough, based upon the specific investment in the township and the allocation of a proper proportion of general plant investment, in arriving at the rate base, and a similar division and allocation of operating,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Reigle v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Altoona v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- State Col. Boro. Auth. v. Pa. P.U.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- State College Borough Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.