Legal Opinion

Reigle v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1926No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

The Borough of Halifax acquired by purchase, in 1917, the assets of a company engaged in furnishing water to its inhabitants and those residing in the immediate vicinity. Since that time the plant has been managed by a board of water commissioners appointed as permitted by the Borough Act (May 14, 1915, P. L. 312, ch. 6, art. XIY, sec. 28). The source of the supply was some miles distant, and the water was conducted therefrom by a pipe which emptied into a reservoir. Prom the latter point, service lines carry the flow to most of the consumers, who reside within…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Coyne v. PrichardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Jolly v. Monaca BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Baily v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Central Iron & Steel Co. v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Yezioro v. North Fayette County Municipal AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Altoona v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Richards v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Ambridge Boro. v. Pa. P.U.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API