Legal Opinion

Darneal v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 30, 1918No. A-2866PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from County Court, Le Flore County; P. C. Bolger, Judge. Silas (Bud). Darneal was convicted of an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMatson, J.

Plaintiff in error, Silas (Bud) Dar-neal, was convicted in the county court of Le Flore county at the August term, 1916, of selling intoxicating liquor to one W. H. Rutledge, and hi's punishment fixed at 30 days’ imprisonment in the county-jail, and to pay a fine of $50.

The facts upon which this conviction is based are about as follows: The prosecuting witness, W. H. Rutledge, together with three other parties who were residents of Spiro, Le Flore county, concluded to purchase some intoxicating liquor for their personal use. They boarded the train at Spiro and rode to Sculleyville in the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hatfield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  4. Loveless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  5. Fletcher v. DulaneyCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sisemore v. VoelkleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Lemmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API