Buchanan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Appeal from Gander County Court; 1. B. Mason, Judge. W. A. Buchanan was found guilty of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
FUKMAN, Presiding Judge.
The defendant resided at Durwood, in Carter county, Okla. At the time of the trial of this case he was a notary public and clerk of the township in which he resided. He maintained an office in Durwood, in which he kept some books and stationery and such other things as are used in notaries’ or township clerks’ offices.
Lee York, a witness for the state, testified: That some time in November or December, 1908, one evening he met the defendant and asked him if he knew where the witness could get some whisky. The defendant replied that he did not know for certain, but that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winchester v. HowardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Young v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Johnson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Siegel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Blunk v. WaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Putman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Medlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
- Tague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.