Legal Opinion

Sisemore v. Voelkle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1957No. 37142PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by two lien claimants ■under the mechanic’s and materialman’s lien statute of this state, 42 O.S.1951 § 161 et seq., from a judgment entered on the suit ■ of A. R. Voelkle and Nellie Bell Voelkle foreclosing a mortgage given by Tulsa Acreage Inc., as a prior lien on certain real -property and improvements situated in Tulsa County.

The basic factual situation out of which the issues of the case arise may be stated briefly as follows: The Voelkles, who will be referred to hereafter as plaintiffs, entered a contract with Tulsa Acreage Inc., under date of December 19, 1953, for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. SayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Balfour v. ParkinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1898
  3. Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Thomas v. Soper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Braden Co. v. Lancaster Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Statser v. Chickasaw Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Voelkle v. SisemoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Oklahoma Hardware Company v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. F & M Bank & Trust Co. v. Gardner Construction Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API