Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Dulaney

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided January 8, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the United States court for the Southern district. C. B. Kilgore, Judge. Suit by John S. Fletcher upon promissory note against H. N. Dulaney and an other. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the United States court for the Southern district. C. B. Kilgore, Judge. Suit by John S. Fletcher upon promissory note against H. N. Dulaney and an other. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. This it a suit brought by appellant (plaintiff below) against appellees (defendants below) upon certain promissory notes executed by defendants, and fully described in plaintiff’s amended complaint, it being alleged that the plaintiff is the owner and holder of said notes. Defendants demurred to plaintiff’s complaint, and, their demurrer being overruled, answered, admitting the…

1Opinion of the CourtSpringer, C. J.

(after stating the facts). The appellant submits six assignments of error in this case, as follows: “First, the court erred in overruling plaintiff’s general demurrer to defendants’ answer; second, the court erred in overruling plaintiff’s special demurrers to defendants’ amended answer; third, the court erred in refusing plaintiff’s first requested instruction; fourth, the court erred in refusing plaintiff’s second requested instruction; fifth, the court erred in admitting, over plaintiff’s objection, the testimony of the witnesses Tom Williams, W. H: Brady, Whit Hyden, and Dr. A. J.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stidham v. O'neals' Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Darneal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API