Legal Opinion

York Et Ux v. Stallings

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1959PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALLISTEB, C.J.

This is a suit in equity brought by Grant York and Iva York, his wife, to enjoin defendants, who operate a sawmill, from interfering with the use and enjoyment of plaintiffs’ premises and to recover damages. From a decree in favor of plaintiffs, the defendants have appealed.

Plaintiffs are the owners of a 320 acre farm situated about one and a half miles west of Milton-Free-water which they acquired in 194-7. During that same year plaintiffs built a modern home on the property at a cost of about $25,000. The house was located just south of an unpaved country road which runs along the north…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Harrisonville v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Dolan v. DeCapuaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland MeadowsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. White Lake Improvement Ass'n v. City of WhitehallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Lloyd Corporation v. WhiffenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. MacCa v. General Telephone Co. of Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API