Legal Opinion

Yuen Suey v. Fleshman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1913PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From Multnomah.: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Eamsey. This is an action by Yuen Suey against A. Fleshman to recover $2,732.30 for money had and received. Judgment for the full amount was rendered in the court below for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ramsey

This is an action to recover $2,732.30 and interest, based on the following facts:

On the 29th day of April, 1908, the appellant and respondent entered into a contract of lease, whereby the appellant demised to the respondent a three-story brick building which he erected for the respondents on lots 1 and 4, in block 38, of Couch’s Addition to the *608City of Portland. The lease was made for a term of 20 years. The building was intended to be used by Chinese tenants. The respondent took possession of the building on May 1, 1908. He covenanted to pay a monthly rental of $775 in advance on the first…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  3. Morrill v. MorrillOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Caesar v. . RubinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Chaude v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Medak v. HekimianOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Alvord v. BanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Capital Garage Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API