Legal Opinion
Vanderslice v. Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 24, 1925No. 15415PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THOMIPSON, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by Nora Vanderslice, administratrix of the estate of E. M. Vanderslice, deceased, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against James C. Davis, as Director General and Agent appointed under section 206 (a) of the Transportation Act of 1920 and for the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, defendant in error, defendant below, to recover the sum of $250,000 damages on account of the death of her husband, E. M. Vanderslice, which was alleged to have been the result of the negligence and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hines v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Texas, O. & E. R. Co. v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Parks v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Chiribel v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963