Legal Opinion

Parks v. City of Oklahoma City

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 20, 1977No. 48539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, the City of Oklahoma City, appeals rulings of the trial court on the admission of documents and testamentary evidence. The excluded matter is alleged to establish the defense the City proposed to raise to John L. Parks’ action against it for personal injuries, property damage and lost wages. These damages were incurred when a city employee, driving a city truck, collided into the rear of plaintiff’s Corvette automobile. It is now conceded that the negligence of the driver of the city truck, Mr. Copeland, caused the collision. The jury fixed Mr. Parks’…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woolfolk v. SemrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Oklahoma City v. PrietoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Dill v. RaderCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. City of Oklahoma City v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. Skogsberg v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF KINGMAN, KAN.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rural Water District 3 v. Owasso Utilities AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Jarvis v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Kunz v. Beneficial TemporariesUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Kunz v. Beneficial TemporariesUtah Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API