Chiribel v. Southern Pacific Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, C. J.:
The main question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court was justified upon the undisputed facts *313in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant, respondent herein, on the ground that the plaintiff’s actions constituted contributory negligence as a matter of law.
More precisely, the question might be thus expressed. Is a person who is injured while attempting to cross over the couplers between two railroad cars, in the middle of a busy switchyard, after dark, guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law — the injury occurring when a switch…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lerette v. Director General of RailroadsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Solen v. Virginia & Truckee RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1878
- Crosman v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1921
- Pinson v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- O'Connor v. North Truckee Ditch Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ruiz v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Fennell v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1978