Legal Opinion

Chiribel v. Southern Pacific Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1963No. 4576PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

The main question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court was justified upon the undisputed facts *313in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant, respondent herein, on the ground that the plaintiff’s actions constituted contributory negligence as a matter of law.

More precisely, the question might be thus expressed. Is a person who is injured while attempting to cross over the couplers between two railroad cars, in the middle of a busy switchyard, after dark, guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law — the injury occurring when a switch…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lerette v. Director General of RailroadsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Solen v. Virginia & Truckee RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Crosman v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Pinson v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. O'Connor v. North Truckee Ditch Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Fennell v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API