Legal Opinion

Hecker v. Schuler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1967No. 40685PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

To divine the nub of this case, we are obliged to scrutinize the statute which mandates the parties to an action to contest a will.

Section 2741.02, Eevised Code, states: “All the devisees, legatees, and heirs of the testator, and other interested persons, including the executor or administrator, must be made parties to an action under Section 2741.01 of the Eevised Code.” (Emphasis supplied.) The insistence of that section is that interested persons be made parties to a will contest.

Quite obviously, in every controversy of this kind, there will, in the nature of things, be devisees or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Draher v. WaltersOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bynner v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Porter v. FennerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Adams v. GurlliesOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Estate of ZonasOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Holland v. CarlsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. In Re Estate of DawsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Hirsch v. HirschOhio Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. In re Estate of FieldsOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API