Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Zonas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1989No. 87-1730PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Re snick, J.

The sole issue before this court is whether an attorney who is employed by beneficiaries of a contested will which is later found to be invalid can recover attorney fees from the estate pursuant to R.C. 2107.75.

Prior to 1945 Ohio courts set forth when attorney fees in a will contest could be payable out of the estate of the decedent since there was no statutory authority. Ordinarily, the courts held that attorney fees would be recoverable only if the attorney hired by the executor or administrator of the estate successfully defended the will in a will contest. In Executors of Andrews v. His…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Matter of Estate of LingscheitSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re Estate of MinskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. State Land Board v. SovenkoOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re the Estate of JollyWashington Supreme Court · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Whitaker v. Estate of WhitakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Sutherland v. Nationwide General InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. In Re Estate of DawsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Rohrich v. NoziskaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API