Legal Opinion

Porter v. Fenner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1966No. 39631PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

No person should be denied the assertion of a cause of action on captious or purely technical grounds and thereby be deprived of his 1 ‘ day in court. ’ ’ To circumvent such a situation, Section 1.11, Revised Code, provides:

“Remedial laws and all proceedings under them shall be liberally construed in order to promote their object and assist the parties in obtaining justice. * * *”

And Section 2309.58, Revised Code, states:

“Before or after judgment, in furtherance of justice and on such terms as it deems proper, the court may amend any pleading, process, or proceeding, by adding or striking out…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peters v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bynner v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Vance v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sharp v. Shelby Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hecker v. SchulerOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Dollar Savings & Trust Co. v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Holland v. CarlsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Shelton v. Ltc Management Services, Unpublished Decision (2-2-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API