Legal Opinion

Draher v. Walters

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1935No. 25099PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Defendants in error concede that all necessary parties were named in the petition as provided by Section 12080, General Code. They contend, however, that defendant Josey Palm, devisee-legatee under the will, is not united in interest with all her co-defendants and that consequently service of summons upon her does not constitute commencement of the action against her co-defendants.

Now what constitutes commencement of an action to contest a will within the meaning of Section 11230, General Code?

Section 10504-32, General Code, provides: “If within six months after probate had, no person…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Flagstar Bank, F.S.B. v. Airline Union's Mortgage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Peters v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Elliott v. Fosdick & Hilmer, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Hecker v. SchulerOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Morisse v. BillauOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API