Legal Opinion
St. Louis. S. F. R. Co. v. Taliaferro
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 10, 1916No. 7694PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Error from County Court, Marshall County; J. I. Henshaw, Judge. Action between the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company and W. N. Taliaferro. From the judgment, the railroad company brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
Motion is filed to. dismiss this appeal because the case-made does not affirmatively show that the order extending the time to make and serve case-made, dated May 20, 1915, has been entered on the journal of the court as required by section 5317, art. 28, c. 60, and' sections 5324, alt. 29, c. 60, Rev. Laws 1910; which sections are as follows: .
“Sec. 5317. Orders, made out of court, shall be forthwith entered by the clerk in the journal of the court, in the same manner as orders made in term.”
“Sec. 5324. On the journal shall be entered the proceedings of the court of each day, and all orders…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cockrell v. SchmittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Jones v. State ex rel. AtherbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
- Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. Gish, Brook & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Thompson v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Shumaker v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Winters v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. BufordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- MacKin v. Darrow Music Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Rogers v. Bass & Harbour Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Ridenour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.