Legal Opinion

Sohio Transportation Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 12, 1984No. 134-82LPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether, and to what extent, the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLM) may charge the plaintiff-applicant the costs incurred by the Federal Government in processing the plaintiff’s application for an oil pipeline right-of-way over federal land.1

Both parties have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons hereafter discussed, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and the plaintiff’s motion is denied.

Facts

Due to the projected completion of the Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline System in 1977, oil industry…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Villa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  2. Sohio Transportation Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. Charter Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  5. Mayne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API