Legal Opinion
Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 27, 1986No. 236-79CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*725OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
I. Introduction
This case is one of a long line of cases where plaintiffs seek the refund of fees allegedly assessed illegally by the Department of the Interior (Interior) to cover the processing costs of applications for gas pipeline rights-of-way sought across federal lands.1 The plaintiffs here, Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Company (Alaskan Arctic), Northern Border Pipeline Company (Northern Border), Pacific Gas Transmission Company (PGT), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG & E), and Pacific Interstate Transmission Company (Pacific Interstate), each filed…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Scientists' Institute for Public Information, Inc. v. Atomic Energy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Somerville v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Alaskan Arctic Gas Pipeline Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987