Legal Opinion
Mayne v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided August 27, 1987No. 166-86LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This contract case is before the court on dispositive cross-motions from the parties. Plaintiffs, pursuant to a contract provision, seek reimbursement of a Maryland county tax imposed on them upon the transfer of their property to defendant. Defendant argues that plaintiffs’ claim is not ripe because it has not been brought before the appropriate administrative body for an initial determination.
FACTS
On December 16, 1980 plaintiffs, members of the Mayne family, conveyed to the United States for use by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 65 acres of real property…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Diamond Shamrock Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Rollock Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Office of Utility Consumer Counselor v. Public Service Co. of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992