Legal Opinion

Agoure v. Lewis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1910No. Civ. No. 831PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank R. Willis, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendant to recover damages for alleged breach of the implied covenant for quiet possession of a lease of real property. Judgment was in favor of defendant. Separate appeals taken from the judgment, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, are presented together.

On August 29, 1906, defendant Lewis, by a written instrument, leased to plaintiff for a term of twenty-two months, to commence on January 1, 1907, about three hundred and fifty acres of land, the same being part of Rancho Guadalasca in Ventura county. One Pierre Agoure at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Levitzky v. CanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. McDowell v. HymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. McAlester v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Lewis v. AgoureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Pierce v. NashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Lafrance v. KashishianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Klein v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Standard Livestock Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API