McDowell v. Hyman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order ■denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff as a tenant of the defendants of the third and fourth floors of the building 105 Stockton street, San Francisco, by reason of repairs and alterations made by defendants upon the second floor of said building, whereby the business of the plaintiff as the keeper of a lodging-house was injured; her water supply cut off, her furniture damaged by dust and lime; her ingress and egress interfered with by debris in the halls and on the stairs, in consequense of which her lodgers forsook their rooms, etc.
The answer denies that…
2Cited by26 opinions
- Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Standard Livestock Co. v. PentzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Pierce v. NashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Roberts v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.