Legal Opinion
Canadian Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Peterson Products of San Mateo, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1965No. 19266PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
In this patent infringement suit the district court entered judgment for defendant, determining that the two patents sued upon are invalid and, in any event, not infringed. The opinion of the district court leading to entry of this judgment is reported in 223 F.Supp. 803.
Plaintiffs appealed from that judgment. They thereafter moved in the district court, under Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence pertaining to the asserted prior art patent of Richard C. Bradley (United States Patent No. 3,123,307). At…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Miguel Moran Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Charles L. Corn v. Guam Coral Company, Inc., Panciteria Far East, Inc. v. Guam Coral Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Jungersen v. BadenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Zamloch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Defenders of Wildlife Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. Mike Bernal Robert Smith, Dr.,superintendent BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Reverend W. Eugene Scott v. Evelle J. YoungerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- United States v. M. Prial CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Sagers v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.