Legal Opinion
Canadian Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Peterson Products of San Mateo, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 13, 1963No. Civ. No. 38070PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEIGERT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Canadian Ingersoll Rand Company, Ltd., and Ibis Enterprises, Ltd., are the owners, and plaintiff, Rand Development Corporation, is the exclusive licensee of certain patents upon a device and method for making fiberglass reinforced plastic articles — Patent No. 2933125, applied for by David F. Anderson on August 6, 1953 and issued to applicant on April 19, 1960, herein referred to as the main patent, and Patent No. 2787314, (Ex. 2) applied for by Anderson on October 13, 1954 and issued April 2, 1957, herein referred to as the improvement patent.
The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The International Glass Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Spray-Bilt, Inc. And David H. Richman v. Ingersoll-Rand World Trade, Limited, and Rand Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Canadian Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Peterson Products of San Mateo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- I. U. Technology Corp. v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.