Legal Opinion

Cary v. Central Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 1936No. 24275PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defendant in error, Central National 'Bank, will be referred to as plaintiff, and Margaret S. Cary, admin-istratrix, plaintiff in error, as defendant.

On the Sth day of December, 1930, John Ira Cary died, leaving a widow, Margaret S. Cary, and three minor children; and on December l.T, 1930, his widow was appointed administratrix of his estate. On the 6th day of January, 1931, the county court made an order allowing $750 a month for the support of deceased’s family “until the return of the inventory in said estate: and that said allowance date iron; December 8, 1930.” The inventory was not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Parker v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Estate of NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harjo v. AubreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API