Legal Opinion

Lamb v. California Water & Telephone Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1942No. L. A. 17655PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

— A contract entered into more than 50 years ago in connection with the water which is made available for irrigation by the Sweetwater Dam in San Diego County, is the basis of the appellant’s action for declaratory and other relief. By that contract, the respondent’s predecessor in interest gave a perpetual right to the use of water upon a certain tract of land. The respondent, a public utility, now refuses to supply water except upon the payment of-the rates fixed for all users.

In the year 1884, Erastus Lake acquired certain lands riparian to the Sweetwater River. Two years later, the San…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  4. Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Natural Gas Service Co. v. Serv-Yu Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API