Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. Eshleman
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Review to be directed against John M. Eshleman, Alex. Gordon, H. D. Lovel, Max Thelen, and Edwin O. Edgerton, as constituting the Railroad Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In this proceeding in certiorari this court is asked to review and set aside an order made by the railroad commission by which petitioner was directed to deliver from its water system a supply of water for the use of one Glass, who owns property in the Del Mar Heights Tract, said Glass to pay one-half of the cost of extending petitioner's pipeline to the north boundary of said Del Mar Heights Tract, the designated point of delivery.
The essential facts developed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railroad v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Palmer Etc. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Duluth & Iron Range Railroad v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
3Cited by57 opinions
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.