Legal Opinion

Acker v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 30, 1984No. Nos. 213-78, 399-78, 76-79, 266-79C, 580-79C, 57-80C, 137-80C and 543-82CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAYER, Judge.

These approximately 400 plaintiffs are now, or have been, employed as teachers in foreign areas by the Department of Defense Overseas Dependents Schools System (Dependents Schools). They claim living quarters allowances and travel agreements which have been denied them. The case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment.

I. Background

Plaintiffs were recruited and hired overseas by Dependents Schools. They fall into a broad category of Dependents Schools teachers known as “local hires,” and are distinguished from another category of teachers in the system who…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. ShimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  5. Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Acker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  2. Salvatore Bortone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Acker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API