Legal Opinion

Acker v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 9, 1993No. Nos. 213-78C, 399-78C, 76-79C, 266-79C, 580-79C, 57-80C, and 543-82CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDEWELT, Judge.

In these consolidated civilian pay actions, the nine remaining plaintiffs,1 teachers presently or formerly employed by the Department of Defense Overseas Dependents School System (DODDS), seek living quarters allowances (LQA) and associated benefits. Plaintiffs’ claims have been the subject of three prior decisions. Acker v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 281, 620 F.2d 802 (1980) (Acker I); Acker v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 503 (1984) (Acker II); Acker v. United States, 23 Cl.Ct. 803 (1991) (Acker III). Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bookman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Acker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Acker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. McAllister v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API