Legal Opinion
Macricostas v. Kovacs
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 27, 2001No. AC 21333PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LANDAU, J.
The defendant, Jerome P. Kovacs, appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Constantine Macricostas, on her complaint and on the defendant’s counterclaim pursuant to the trial court’s granting of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that there were no genuine issues of material fact. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*131The appeal arises out of an action to quiet title to real property. The plaintiff became the owner of certain parcels of land in Newtown and Brookfield as the successful…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Lees v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Cortes v. CottonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hill v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. Van EckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Carr v. Fleet BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Levine v. 418 Meadow Street Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.