Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Prestia

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 15, 1992No. 10669PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

This action was brought under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes §§ 42-110a through 42-1 lOq, on behalf of a class of low income tenants who sought injunctive and monetary relief from their landlords for the landlords’ failure to obtain certificates of occupancy and their failure to maintain the housing in a habitable condition. The trial court, Goldstein, J., rendered a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of liability on the CUTPA claim. The case was then tried to the court, Susco, J., on the issue of damages. The court *159awarded actual…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Solomon v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Frank v. StreeterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Building Supply Corp. v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Northeast Savings, F.A. v. ScherbanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Ficara v. O'ConnorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Foote v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API