Legal Opinion
Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 4, 1995No. 15146PublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s factual determinations of defamation and breach of an implied contract of employment. The plaintiff, Anushavan Torosyan, brought this action alleging that the defendant, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., had terminated his employment in violation of an express contract, an implied contract and public policy, and that it had defamed him. After a court trial, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff only on the counts alleging breach of an implied contract and…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- D'Ulisse-Cupo v. Board of Directors of Notre Dame High SchoolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Taravella v. Town of WolcottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.