Upper Third Street Development Corp. v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The plaintiff contends that its complaint states a good cause of action under the rule laid down in Feiten v. Milwaukee (1879), 47 Wis. 494, 2 N. W. 1149. Such rule is that, in order for a landowner to recover in a cause of action against a municipality for abandonment' of a condemnation proceeding, such abandonment must both be “wrongful and injurious.” It is conceded that the instant complaint does sufficiently allege that the plaintiff did sustain damages as a result of the abandonment of the proceeding. Therefore, the only issue on this appeal is whether such abandonment was “wrongful” in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Gibson Properties Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Feiten v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Lord Calvert Theatre, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- A. Gettelman Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nadler v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Nadler v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986