Legal Opinion

Upper Third Street Development Corp. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The plaintiff contends that its complaint states a good cause of action under the rule laid down in Feiten v. Milwaukee (1879), 47 Wis. 494, 2 N. W. 1149. Such rule is that, in order for a landowner to recover in a cause of action against a municipality for abandonment' of a condemnation proceeding, such abandonment must both be “wrongful and injurious.” It is conceded that the instant complaint does sufficiently allege that the plaintiff did sustain damages as a result of the abandonment of the proceeding. Therefore, the only issue on this appeal is whether such abandonment was “wrongful” in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamer v. State Highway Commission of the MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Gibson Properties Co. v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Feiten v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Lord Calvert Theatre, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. A. Gettelman Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nadler v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  2. Nadler v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API