Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nadler v. City of Mason City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 21, 1986No. 85-586, 85-503Published

1DissentReynoldson, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent from division I of the majority opinion. Although the city’s good or bad faith in the investigation and prosecution of the condemnation may be relevant as a separate ground for damages, the issue whether the delay was unreasonable should be objectively determined as a separate matter. Such a view is supported by the authorities the majority relies on.

While this court in Skaff v. Sioux City, 168 N.W.2d 789 (Iowa 1969), did make the statement the majority quotes, there is nothing in that decision indicating the trial court determined the delay in prosecution was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HelmArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ford v. Board of Park CommissionersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Skaff v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Upper Third Street Development Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API