Legal Opinion
Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local 395 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Hanlin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 18, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 6929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
This appeal is taken from judgment after trial to the court in favor of the defendant, H. James Hanlin, doing business as Jim Hanlin Contracting Company (Hanlin). Hanlin, a contractor, executed a Memorandum Agreement by which he agreed to be bound by the Arizona Master Labor Agreement. The Master Labor Agreement is an industry-wide collective bargaining agreement negotiated between several unions performing construction work and a multiemployer bargaining unit composed both of formal associations representing groups of contractors and several independent contractors.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jim McNeff, Inc. v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Warehouse, Processing, Distribution Workers Union v. Hugo Neu Proler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Department of Health Services v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Department of Health Services v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1990