Legal Opinion
Warehouse, Processing, Distribution Workers Union v. Hugo Neu Proler Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 21, 1998No. B114148PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.—
I. Introduction
The present case had its genesis in a collective bargaining agreement which required labor and management to arbitrate the application of its terms to a dispute over the seniority rights of a union member. Warehouse, Processing, Distribution Workers Union, Local 26 (the union) appeals from an order awarding $13,840 in attorney’s fees to Hugo Neu Proler Company (the employer) pursuant to Labor Code section 1128. Section 1128 governs attorney’s fee awards in actions involving arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement. The United States Supreme Court…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Verizon California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Nashiro v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Teamsters Local 117 v. Davis Wire Corp.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2001