Legal Opinion

Sakraida v. Sakraida

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, C. J.

A decree of divorce in favor of the appellant awarded her the custody of the minor child of the parties. Afterwards, on motion of the respondent, the decree was modified so as to award the custody of the child to him. The appellant duly served and filed notice of appeal from the modifying order and gave an undertaking to pay all damages, costs and disbursements which might be awarded against her on the appeal. The child is in the actual custody of the respondent, and the appellant has now moved this court for an order restoring the custody to her pending the appeal, on the ground that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hurner v. HurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Leverich v. LeverichOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Cooke v. CookeUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Commonwealth v. YarnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Ex parte QueiroloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Caveny v. ASHEIMOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Goldson v. GoldsonOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Henrickson v. HenricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Shrout v. ShroutOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bogh v. LumbattisOregon Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API