Ex parte Queirolo
California Supreme Court
WRIT of habeas corpus to the sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco, to test the validity of an order of the Superior Court of the City and Cóunty of San Francisco, imprisoning petitioner for contempt of court. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Application for discharge on habeas corpus. By the decree of divorce between petitioner and her husband the -court awarded her the custody of the three minor children of the marriage; subsequently, the court modified its decree by awarding the custody of the children to the father. From the *636decree as thus modified petitioner took an appeal to this court, which appeal is still pending. After the perfecting of said appeal hy the petitioner, the court below made an order directing her to make immediate delivery of the children to the father; and, upon her failure to comply adjudged her guilty of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Ruggles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Stateler v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Vosburg v. VosburgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Gotthelf v. FickettArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- In Re BarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sakraida v. SakraidaOregon Supreme Court · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.