Legal Opinion

State v. Flowers

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1984No. 83AP-860PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.

Defendant, Dale L. Flowers, appeals from his conviction of aggravated burglary in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and initially raised two assignments of error, as follows:

“1. Absent proof that the defendant trespassed in the residence of another with the intention of committing a theft offense or a felony, the court below erred:
“(A) In overruling defendant’s motion for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Criminal Rule 29.
“(B) In finding defendant guilty of aggravated burglary.
“2. The trial court improperly considered appellant’s failure to testify on his own behalf.”

Defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. KuligOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. SorgeeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cox v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ClellandOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. RoseberryOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. LevingstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. Cesar Bernel-AvejaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API