Legal Opinion

State v. Clelland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1992No. 91CA9PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

Jimmie Clelland, defendant-appellant, appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered following a bench trial by the Hocking County Court of Common Pleas finding him guilty of burglary in violation of R.C. 2911.12(A)(1), an aggravated felony of the second degree.-

Appellant assigns the following errors:

“I. The trial court erred in failing to suppress the statements of the defendant and the evidence seized from the defendant, in that the state failed to prove that the defendant made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment U.S. constitutional…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State v. Lattimore, Unpublished Decision (12-16-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. WemerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. MetcalfOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. RiedelOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API