Legal Opinion

Cox v. Ohio Department of Transportation

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1981No. Nos. 80-1328, 80-1458 and 80-1491PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals based its reversal of the Court of Claims in each of the cases sub judice on different grounds. We shall review the various pronouncements of the lower court to determine whether any of the rationales propounded below construing R. C. 2743.16 is correct.

Case No. 80-1328

The preliminary question in No. 80-1328, the Cox case, concerns whether the 180-day filing requirement imposed by former R. C. 2743.16(A) was a true statute of limitations. Appellee argues that the applicable statute of limitations under the former R. C. 2743.16 was actually two years by virtue of R. C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. West LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Drain v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Bedford Heights v. TallaricoOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of Kent v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Smith v. HandyOhio Supreme Court · 1847

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re Bruce S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. FlowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Read v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. BlantonOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API