Legal Opinion

State v. Sorgee

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1978No. Nos. 76-1292 and 76-1293PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.

Although it is not the function of this court to consider the weight of the evidence when reviewing the trial court’s record in a criminal case, the record may be examined to determine whether it includes sufficient evidence which, if believed, would convince the average juror of the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Atkins v. State (1926), 115 Ohio St. 542. It is also well settled that, where circumstantial evidence alone is relied upon to prove an essential element of an offense, such evidence must be consistent only with the theory of guilt and irreconcilable with any reasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KuligOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Atkins v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Carter v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. EleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API