Legal Opinion

Cone v. Barganier

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 1928No. 3 Div. 834PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Appellant urges here that the probate court acted upon the application for probate of the will of Mr. Barganier without all interested parties being brought before that court. This suggestion is untenable on appeal, without the question was reserved in the lower court and presented for review in the manner recognized by the courts. If appellant desired to duly present the question of parties, he should have moved the probate court to set aside the probate, or there become a party and sued out an appeal.

The probate of a will is in nature a proceeding in rem, and by appropriate procedure and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Bidwell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Whitehead v. BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Stanley v. BeckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Garrett v. SnowdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Whitaker v. KennamerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API