Legal Opinion
Clark v. Whitfield
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 20, 1928No. 2 Div. 914PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
This is the second appeal in this case. The first appeal is reported in 213 Ala. 441, 105 So. 200. The bill was amended to meet the opinion of this Court and came on for finál hearing and decree.
It is a bill for the sale of mineral land for division. The sale was made, and the Bessemer Coal & Land Company became the purchaser for $20,000. The Bessemer Company owned an undivided one-twelfth interest; appellants- owned an undivided five-twelfths, and the other parties, not here complaining, own a half. The Bessemer Company has worked the Woodstock seam at Belle Ellen, and it is claimed leased…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New Domain Oil & Gas Co. v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Raynolds v. HannaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Sanders v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Fulmer v. Williams, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Puget Sound Gillnetters Association v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, United States of America, Real Parties in Interest. Columbia River Fishermen's Protective Union, Inc., Petitioners v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, and United States of America, Real Parties in Interest-Appellees. United States of America v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Sun Oil Co. v. OswellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Walden v. WaldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Security Ins. Co. of New Haven v. DazeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Love v. Sims-Morgan Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.