Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Beck

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1942No. 7 Div. 688PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an appeal from the final settlement of an administration had in equity.

There was no reference to the register and no report from a master upon the status of the accounts of the administrator. The presiding judge heard much of the testimony from the witnesses in open court, and some of it was taken before a commissioner.

We said in Alexander v. Hicks, ante, p. 243, -5 So.2d 781, that equity procedure has wisely provided for a reference where the register may see and hear the witnesses, state an account disclosing his findings on the several issues. Provision is made for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Hale v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. McCreeliss's Distributees v. HinkleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Mitchell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Penney v. Pritchard & McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Hart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Bolton v. Barnett Lumber & Supply CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Spruiell v. STANDFORDSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API