Legal Opinion
Roberson v. City of Rialto CA4/2
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 2014No. E058187UnpublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.—
I. INTRODUCTION
On July 15, 2008, defendant and respondent, City of Rialto (the City), through its city council, adopted several “project approvals,” clearing the way for the construction of a large commercial retail center in the City, to be anchored by a Wal-Mart Supercenter (the project). Plaintiff and appellant, Marcus L. Roberson, petitioned the trial court for a writ of administrative mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) invalidating and setting aside the project approvals, namely, a resolution certifying an environmental impact report for the project, resolutions…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Boeken v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2010
- Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Atwell v. City of Rohnert Park, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Inland Oversight Comm. v. City of San Bernardino, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- City of Cedar Rapids v. Marla Marie LeafSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Atwell v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.